Why Was Albert Einstein Not Religious?

Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind. This popular quote of Albert Einstein has been repeatedly used, particularly in science versus religion debates. But from this statement alone can one say that Einstein was arguing for religion? A large number of believers definitely think so, referring to this adage and thus claiming the greatest scientist of the 20th century as one of their own.

However, Einstein had also famously written: "The idea of a personal God is a childlike one," in a letter to a friend dated 28 September 1949.

Einstein even went on to say, "You may call me an agnostic but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth."

From this saying alone, we can conclude that Einstein was neither a religious man in the usual sense nor was he a staunch atheist. Einstein was agnostic in belief. If you think about it, agnosticism really is the essence of science, whether ancient or modern.

Being an agnostic simply means that a man shall not say he knows or believes that which he has "no scientific grounds" for professing to know or believe.

Does God play dice? (Einstein's most famous quote)

Einstein was expected to make many statements on the origin of life, the universe and existence of God. Some of the views resonated with religious groups, but that does not make Einstein a believer. Albert Einstein was in fact one of the most famous agnostics in America, others being Edwin Hubble, Carl Sagan, John Bardeen, etc. and yet Einstein's name and his quotes are selectively chosen as merely "tools" by debaters to silence an opposition.

What had Einstein meant really, when he said: Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind?

Actually, he was making a reference to a large part of human history in which science and religion were intertwined or interdependent. He put it like this, indicating that the interdependency still existed in the modern society.

This does not suggest in any way that Einstein was a deeply religious person and nor does it provide any surface to anyone to interpret it in such a way. If truth be told, Einstein had strongly asserted in one of his statements - "The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses."

So if Einstein wasn't even religious in the most ordinary sense, why his name is often dragged in trivial debates? Because it is assumed by a large number of people that in science "Einstein" is the authority. But they are wrong, because in actuality there is no authority in science. Feynman said: You can be the most amazing minds, if your ideas do not agree with experiment it is wrong. No matter who you are.

This is precisely how science progresses, by challenging, by having no authority, by questions and doubts; whereas religion has not progressed for hundreds and thousands of years.

Einstein's views were simply, that nature is not nurtured. That nature itself is nurturing. This is the ultimate essence of Spinozism a philosophical system which was largely advocated by Einstein. Spinoza belief is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world, the universe, so far as our science can reveal it.

Just a year before his death, Einstein had replied to a fan in a letter, "It was of course a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly."